Archive for “Bird nest” typology

Steven Holl ,Louis Kahn and Herzog de Meuron. You too , I found “In My Backyard”?

Posted in public buildings, Uncategorized with tags , , , , , , , , , on September 4, 2018 by eliinbar

‏‏Eliinbar Sketches Steven Holl Luis Kahn - עותק

Eliinbar Sketches 2018 – Steven Holl ,Louis Kahn and Herzog de Meuron

In My Backyard

This is my last post from “My Backyard

A series of posts, In which I present for your review, buildings that I found “in my backyard” and photographed them for you.

All buildings are within 60 km from home

The choice to photograph these buildings was not random

They remind me of forgotten posts

For you to judge

This is Steven Holl‘s – Simons Hall , from 1992

Notice to the clear characteristics of the building envelope ,repetitive square windows without a clear reference to internal functions

Simmons_Hall_BIG

A different angle to the Steven Holl’s  Simons Hall , from 1992

d7a1d798d799d791d79f-d794d795d79c-d797d796d799d7aa-d7a8d799d791d795d7a2d799-d791d798d795d79f00011

And this is Steven Holl’s Sliced Porosity Block project In  Chengdu, Sichuan ,China

2007-2012

Notice to the clear characteristics of the building envelope,

repetitive square windows without a clear reference to internal functions

Linked Hybrid

Check the   NEW  CONSCIOUS  INSPIRATION  PAGE

in my Facebook

Six years later

I photographed this building in “In my backyard“ 04012016,200147 For you to judge

You are welcome to visit previous and  relevant posts of mine:

https://archidialog.com/2009/11/01/buildings-9/

https://archidialog.com/2013/05/31/inspiration-from-existing-buildings-conscious-inspiration-if-youre-gonna-do-it-do-it-right/

https://archidialog.com/2010/06/01/expo-2010-republic-of-korea-pavilion-multi-inspirations-building-2/

BIRD NEST typology

This is the National Stadium –designed by Hezog De Meuron Architects

 the “bird nest” Beijing   2001-2008

Notice the dominant BIRD NEST typology

birds_nest_beijing_arup5

Ten years later

I photographed this building in “my backyard

Bird Nest Design

For you to judge

And finally, a sketch by Louis Kahn from the 1960s 

I found in Louis Kahn’s archives:

aaup.030.790.156

A sketch of the

Baltimore Inner Harbor , designed by Louis Kahn in

1969-1973

Notice to the clear characteristics of the building envelope,

repetitive square windows combined with diagonal beams

This is once more ,Steven Holl’s  Sliced Porosity Block project In  Chengdu, Sichuan ,China  2007-2012     

From a different angle

sliced-porosity-block-024

‏‏Eliinbar Sketches Steven Holl Luis Kahn - עותק

Check the   NEW  CONSCIOUS  INSPIRATION  PAGE

in my Facebook

If you fantasize about being Toyo Ito, Herzog de Meuron or perhaps Rem Koolhaas, that is easy, two doses of “BIRD NEST typology” ,a single dose of “BRANCHING design”And you’re all set….

Posted in Inspiration Source, public buildings with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on July 19, 2014 by eliinbar

eliinbar’s sketches 2014-Branching design or in other words the “Bird nest” typology

 eliinbar’s sketches 2014 – Branching design or in other words the “Bird nest” typology

Today’s post will be the third of a series, inquiring whether one of the leading architectural firms in the world, OMA of Rem Koolhaas, is a popular Inspiration Source for architects today.

Today’s main configuration of a building designed by Oma and Rem Koolhass is a prominent source of inspiration , the branching design or in other words the “bird nest” typology .

THE MAIN CONFIGURATION

Branching design

The branching design is based on Toyo Ito’s and Cecil Balmond’s

Serpentine Gallery Pavilion (2002) in London shown in the next image.

Serpentine Gallery Pavilion (2002) in London

A few words about Cecil Balmond:

Cecil Balmond sees his work as an open-ended visual application of theory, following the principle that “structure as conceptual rigour is architecture

Balmond’s research is about complexity and non-linear organization ,he investigates mathematical concepts and their influence on natural forms and structures

A few words about Toyo Ito:

Toyo Ito received the Royal Gold Medal at the RIBA on 15 February 2006

Jack Pringle, RIBA President described Toyo Ito’s work :.

Toyo Ito has been an inspiration for generations of architects worldwide since his work started to receive international acclaim in the 1970s. For thirty years he has been a leading figure in architecture and I am delighted that he has accepted the Royal Gold Medal.

THE ORIGINS

(Inspiration Sources)

It is hard to say for certain ..but I think that the following projects are definitely good candidates to be the ORIGINS sources of inspiration for the BRANCHING design
and the BIRD NEST typology

BIRD NEST typology

Hezog De Meuron Architects

National Stadium – the “bird nest” Beijing   2001-2008

birds_nest_beijing_arup5

and it’s Inspiration source: Chinese ceramic ware – Vase with crakle

VLUU L100, M100  / Samsung L100, M100

BRANCHING design

In 2001,architect Toyo Ito designed Tods’ Omotesando Store in Tokyo.

A unique organic design that was called the “Tree Building

Tods’ Omotesando Store in Tokyo 2002-2004

Tod’s Omotesando Building By Toyo Ito & Associates-Photographs©Toyo Ito & Associate

and it’s Inspiration source, the Zelkova trees shown in the next image  : (Tods’ Store is located in Omotesandō who is a Zelkova tree-lined avenue located in Shibuya and Minato,Tokyo)

04-shade-trees

Toyo Ito about Tods’ Omotesando Store in Tokyo (From  HOUSE VARIETY) :

we enclosed the site with a wall that gives the impression of a row Zelkova trees  The facade of criss-crossed concrete braces reinterprets the silhouettes of the trees on the Omotesandō. This exterior surface serves as both graphic pattern and structural system

Our various studies started with the question, “How can we escape the conventional notion of a wall structure?” In other words, we were seeking a way to avoid transparent openings in an opaque volume. Instead of distinguishing transparency from opaqueness, we were seeking a new method that would simultaneously define and unite them – we were attempting to relate all the lines (columns), surfaces (walls), and openings in an innovative way. Our studies suddenly moved in a different direction after formulating the question: “Shouldn’t it be possible to create a surface as structure that directly expresses the flow of force, so long as it is formed as a structural diagram drawn as a pattern of thick lines on a flat surface?”

 –

The Contemporary Inspiration Source

OMA and Rem Koolhaas’s Faena Arts Center, Miami Beach, USA, 2014

Faena Arts Center_Indian Creek_Copyright OMA_big

Check the   NEW  CONSCIOUS  INSPIRATION  PAGE

in my Facebook

we passed 11,000 likes

thank you all

Enjoy

 –

Conscious Inspiration today

more “branching” design

1

2010-10-11-Park51SomaArchitectsRendering2-thumb

leonardo-glass-cube1

zahacitydreamsmacau-1

dzn_Gimpo-Art-Gallery-by-G_Lab-02

city-hall-for-budapest-by-erick-van-egeraat-aq376_n39_webview

1509_EXT_VIEW_04

hoff01

city-hall-for-budapest-by-erick-van-egeraat-patio-orchestra

bionic-tower111209_LAVA_BT_02_Detail_Facade523x285_300

Print

2_project_1001780632

IMG_4460


more “bird nest” typology

a

Bird_s_nest_staircase

1201-Roshan-120312-11x17-v1.psd

images (6)

eybl

manny-building

birds-nest-lamp

birds-nest-occasional-chair

images (2)

stairs-2-e1305288889679

modern_design_round_bed_3_the_Bird

photo-3-4

94

Finally, what  do you think about the following example?

for you to judge….

Tod’s Omotesando Building By Toyo Ito & Associates-Photographs©Toyo Ito & Associates-23

Tods’ Omotesando Store from within,designed by architect Toyo Ito 

In 2001

and this is  Hezog De Meuron’s

Prada Store from 2003 located ten minutes walk from the Tod’s Omotesando Store

Prada-store-by-Herzog-and-De-MeuronTokyo-02

Check the   NEW  CONSCIOUS  INSPIRATION  PAGE

in my Facebook

we passed 11,000 likes

thank you all

Enjoy

 –

what did i learn from this post?

As in any field that deals with  creation and invention, the people engaged in it are divided into two groups.

The first group is very small, they have the skills that allow them to innovate Big time.

Most of us belong to the second group, we get inspiration from the first group.

I do not think there is a problem with that….

The big questions are:

Do we know how to  be  inspired in a conscious way?

Do we know how to choose our source of inspiration in a way that enhances our buildings?

Do we copy and paste, or insist to add our invention?

What are the tools needed to improve the realization of the three previous questions?

This blog examines the

 inspiration sources

 of contemporary architectural projects

 I put a virtual

 mirror  

 reflecting processes of

conscious and

unconscious inspiration among Architects

and you judge

 But my challenge is not over yet

If my

mirror

 reflects the reality correctly

Then is needed a change in architecture profession training

And I will explane

You probably noticed that the differences between

Conscious Inspiration” and “Copy paste

are rather vague

And there is a consensus that

 Copy-paste is disastrous for the architectural profession

We all know that the basis for all architectural design , is the uniquesite

 on which the building is built

so how can we copy buildings?

For that I strive to develope a responsive training method for architects

I call it the

 Conscious Inspiration Method

The “Conscious Inspiration Method” is  learning to be inspired  consciously  from existing buildings

With the methodology of “conscious Inspiration”, we don’t need to be intimidated to get inspired from relevant buildings.  Once we develop our designing tools =“Codex Rules”, it will lead us to high quality creative architecture

.

I believe that the natural development of architecture design is based on 

inspiration techniques

I call them

Codex Rules

In my next posts ,I will show some Interesting  inspiration techniques